🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat state that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the problem is creating avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Ancient Graveyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being consumed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the issue sets out a range of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure sites. Authorities maintain it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. My parents intended this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one graveyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. Individuals will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of treasures. That is completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while serving overseas. His parent expressed she could not sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It truly disturb me to think this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

She believes, new burials should stop but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Certainty

An absence of consensus over when and how to tackle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Several families want more coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to proceed for now. Others argue the time for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A local official said the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

He added there was time to consider all the options. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no common view on what should be done yet. We need productive local conversations to find the right solutions for each community.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, offering a spiritual perspective on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.