🔗 Share this article

Last year, star Jude Law stated he had no concerns about backlash for portraying the Russian leader in a new film. This production, however, could coincide so closely with the mythologized version circulated by official channels that, within Russia, it functions as a compliment rather than a critique.

The Manufactured Superhero

Over a long period, the Russian political apparatus and its pop-culture machine have worked together to forge a made-to-measure persona of the president. This character is a political superhero devoid of flaws, an ex-intelligence officer reimagined as a Russian James Bond who consistently understands beyond what he shows.

“Domestically, the manufactured Putin has long eclipsed the actual person.”

Cinematic Reinforcement

One recent example is a television show launched last fall, directed by a Kremlin supporter. The protagonist is a fictional blue-eyed lieutenant colonel inexplicably chosen to “rescue” the nation from chaos. While he is called a different name, the implication is unmistakable: the hero must be a familiar security officer.

International depictions often end up buttressing this identical story rather than debunking it. A new film inspired by a popular book sets out to undermine the leader's mythology by framing him not as a cause but as a consequence, shifting the focus to the political machinery surrounding him.

The Myth of the Reluctant Leader

In the film, Putin is presented as having been chosen by influential figures to stabilise the nation because he is “young, athletic and a spy”. The oligarchs approach him and all but beg him to become president. His response is that he would rather govern from the background, seeking permanent power.

This tale is a key piece of state propaganda: the detached, unwilling mastermind shaped by destiny. Historically, these events took place.

The Truth Behind the Selection

Nobody actually pleaded with Putin to take the job. The presidency was effectively a selection process with many candidates. Central to the selection stood an influential oligarch from the previous administration who planned to control the country de facto.

• The shortlist featured several politicians, including a reformer later murdered and a former spy chief.
• Per a journalist who studied Putin’s biography, the future president simply fitted the necessary criteria: loyal, from the intelligence world, and not a communist or a liberal.
• A property developer close to the events stated the primary requirement was controllability and faithfulness, not strength.

“The goal wasn't a strong candidate, they needed someone malleable, someone who would obey orders.”

Constructing the Spy Legend

Experts agree that the notion of Putin as a powerful KGB spy was built after the fact. Claims about his clandestine activities in East Germany fall apart under examination. In essence, he handled paperwork and routine duties, a mid-level functionary not engaged in actual agent work.

Curiously, the shift to framing him as a “spy” could partly have been triggered by the actor's arrival as 007. The grittier interpretation prompted Russian media and online audiences to make comparisons with Putin. Edited images replacing Craig’s face with Putin’s surfaced on Moscow streets, feeding the growing tendency to see him as a local secret agent.

A Propaganda Win?

Given the casting, an star well-liked by viewers there, the authorities are likely to seize the opportunity to portray this choice as a minor diplomatic triumph. Its exclusion of public dissent, the political rivals, or key figures from its narrative, despite covering the past decade, is a welcome aspect for official messaging.

Domestically, Putin is frequently an omnipotent figure who remains unseen on screen. His influence is hinted at through portraits or calls “from above”. Now, he finally acquires a recognizable face—one that could unintentionally validate the very myths it might seek to question.