🔗 Share this article

When dawn crept over the Amazonian city of Belém on Saturday morning, delegates remained confined in a enclosed conference room, unaware whether it was day or night. For more than 12 hours in difficult discussions, with dozens ministers representing 17 groups of countries ranging from the poorest nations to the most developed economies.

Frustration mounted, the air stifling as weary delegates faced up to the harsh reality: they were unlikely to achieve a comprehensive agreement in Brazil. The 30th UN climate conference hovered near the brink of abject failure.

The central impasse: Fossil fuels

As science has told us for nearly a century, the greenhouse gases produced by burning fossil fuels is increasing temperatures on our planet to critical levels.

Nevertheless, during over three decades of annual climate meetings, the essential necessity to cease fossil fuel use has been referenced only once – in a decision made two years ago at previous UN climate talks to "shift from fossil fuels". Delegates from the Arab Group, Russia, and several other countries were resolved this would not occur another time.

Growing momentum for change

Simultaneously, a increasing coalition of countries were similarly resolved that progress on this issue was vitally needed. They had created a proposal that was gathering increasing support and made it apparent they were willing to hold firm.

Developing countries strongly sought to advance on securing economic resources to help them cope with the growing impacts of extreme weather.

Turning point

By the early hours of Saturday, some delegates were willing to walk out and trigger failure. "We were close for us," stated one energy minister. "I was ready to walk away."

The critical development happened through negotiations with Saudi Arabia. Around 6am, principal delegates split from the main group to hold a confidential discussion with the head Saudi negotiator. They urged text that would obliquely recognise the global commitment to "transition away from fossil fuels" made two years earlier in Dubai.

Unexpected agreement

As opposed to explicitly referencing fossil fuels, the text would refer to "the previous commitment". After consideration, the Saudi delegation surprisingly approved the wording.

Participants collapsed into relief. Celebrations began. The settlement was finalized.

With what became known as the "Amazon accord", the world took another small step towards the systematic reduction of fossil fuels – a faltering, inadequate step that will minimally impact the climate's steady march towards catastrophe. But nevertheless a important shift from absolute paralysis.

Major components of the agreement

• Complementing the oblique commitment in the formal agreement, countries will start developing a framework to phase out fossil fuels
• This will be mostly a voluntary initiative led by Brazil that will report back next year
• Addressing the required reductions in greenhouse gas emissions to not exceed the 1.5C limit was also put off to next year
• Developing countries achieved a significant expansion to $120bn of annual finance to help them cope with the impacts of environmental crises
• This sum will not be fully available until 2035
• Workers will benefit from a "fair adjustment program" to help people working in polluting businesses transition to the renewable industry

Varied responses

As the world hovers near the brink of climate "tipping points" that could eliminate habitats and throw whole regions into chaos, the agreement was far from the "giant leap" needed.

"Negotiators delivered some modest progress in the proper course, but considering the magnitude of the climate crisis, it has fallen short of the occasion," stated one policy director.

This flawed deal might have been the maximum achievable, given the geopolitical headwinds – including a American leader who ignored the talks and remains aligned with oil and coal, the increasing presence of conservative movements, continuing wars in different locations, intolerable levels of inequality, and global economic uncertainty.

"Major polluters – the energy conglomerates – were at last in the focus at the climate summit," comments one climate activist. "There is no turning back on that. The platform is accessible. Now we must convert it to a genuine solution to a protected environment."

Deep fissures revealed

Although nations were able to applaud the official adoption of the deal, Cop30 also exposed major disagreements in the primary worldwide framework for confronting the climate crisis.

"Climate conferences are agreement-dependent, and in a era of international tensions, consensus is progressively challenging to reach," stated one senior UN official. "We should not suggest that this summit has provided all that is needed. The disparity between present circumstances and what science demands remains alarmingly large."

Should the world is to prevent the gravest consequences of climate breakdown, the global discussions alone will prove insufficient.